Friday, March 2, 2018

Post 7 from Mark!



This week’s theme is Space...how an ongoing conversation with particular units of space can interact with performance.  Space can be a medium of expression, the context of the same (for both performer and audience), a character within the story, and a shapeshifter that bends the lines of these definitions to play many roles at once.  Peter Brook famously said of stage space, that is “has two rules: anything can happen and something must happen.”

Well then. The Space is Fort Irwin...let’s see what happens.





Rehearsal Process

In “Rehearsing the Warrior Ethos,” we read about how a totally immersive, environmental theatre engagement is used to rehearse the pursuit of very specific, unfolding, real-life narratives. This simulation is both a performance and rehearsal process for the eventual staging of its showing in the theatre of war.  This production’s concept?  “[T]he major narratives...to foment democracy, to work with the Iraqi population, and to take police action necessary to put down insurgents, all the while doing everything possible to avoid making more enemies by generating bitterness and mistrust. “

The text upon which this production is based was an ongoing war and the changing agenda of its authors.  Of course, changing the aspirational narrative of a performance can’t help but alter the rehearsal process.  Imagine a far less nuanced Fort Irwin scenario when the simulation’s aim was something along the lines of: “to wipe our insurgency whatever the cost.”

“Realism, is not only selectively deployed, it is selectively desired”

The same way that an inflexible insistence on realism can diminish the more general, truth-seeking value of the narrative in play (e.g., Mike’s example of Judi Dench miming the mirror instead of slavishly working with a real one, etc…) within the simulation at Fort Irwin, the performance is “negotiated between striving for realism/authenticity and finding a space where such qualities are compromised or made elastic for the sake of the goals and protocols of the exercise.”  The is goals are aligned to production’s “concept” of winning hearts and minds on the ground in Iraq, and they are reflected in the rehearsal/performance at Fort Irwin.
After all, that’s why we rehearse plays, isn’t it?  To explore the material and its scenarios in a way that when the moment of truth arrives we deliver the goods to the audience.


The Readiness is All…

 

From wolf cubs exercising their capacity to pin down quarry to the subtle trial and error social exchanges that form our personal protocol, there is a constant element of rehearsal that attends life itself.  Whether we consciously spell it out or whether it’s something more intuitive, it usually turns out that, when the Moment of Truth arrives, we are likely to do not what we hoped for, nor what we’ve decided is best, but rather that which we’ve rehearsed.  The present tense is always connected to a future that will become the present, and, whether it takes place in a system as measured and carefully monitored as that of Fort Irwin, we’re always preparing for it.  Amanda Wingfield, take us home: “...future becomes the present, the present becomes the past, and the past turns into everlasting regret if you don't plan for it!” (The Glass Menagerie, Williams).  If most of life is made up of a series of one kind of a performance or another, aren’t we rehearsing just about all the time too?

The performance metaphor only stretches so far though.  When Fort Irwin’s units reach the real theatre, they will be performing in a context not so clearly defined: the roles of spectator, performer, and every shade in between are fluid according to the situation at best and probably undefinable. 



Sleep No More: A Certified Schechner Environmental Theatre Event.
 

The next two articles deal with theatre in the environmentally immersive key.  I haven’t seen Sleep No More, but, from what I’ve been able to learn from this week’s material, it would seem that the Punchdrunk production could carry (if there were such a qualifying stamp of approval) the aforementioned certification.  Schechner’s requisite elements are all there:

The multi-directional transactions between the various elements of production, audience, and space.  The fluid delineation of spatial boundaries given to performance and spectator space…Space that is found, negotiated with, and transformed: “in a negotiated environment a more fluid situation leads sometimes to the performance being controlled by the spectators.” (I think there are among us those who have experienced Sleep No More.  I wonder, is the suggestion that your participation in the show created your own particular “poetic, associative narrative” consistent with your experience?)  A shifting focus that is extended over a hundred rooms. “All production elements speak in their own language”:  It seems that Sleep No More’s production elements translate their textual origins into their own particular, expressive idiom.  The text need be neither the starting point nor the goal of the production: there may be no text at all”.  Of course, Sleep No More’s ancestry includes a very concrete text, but, as integral as the script is to both the production’s conception and execution, “every line of Shakespeare’s Macbeth is embedded in multiple languages—sound, light, design, and dance,” the structure of this “immersive” event is not dictated by the dramatic plot” (Stacey, 2009).

I think Schencher would approve.  What do you think?

The many different characterized locations in the Sleep No More space (the cemetery, a parlour with various mementoes, a child’s room, an office, a bedroom, a small library alcove, a nursery…) form some of this environmental ensemble that Worthen called the “Space of Character.”  Spatializing different aspect of Macbeth into the various places dedicated to Sleep No More reminds me of how, back in the good ole’ real life, we take part in little, immersive performance events all the time.  The spatial qualities of any given place enact a considerable role in how the scenes are played.  Consider how social chemistry, norms of behaviour, and a general mood might contrast between two places like a kindergarten classroom and a graveyard...a circus tent and a prison cell.  The space in each is both a defining variable in the transaction between all acting entities and one of the players itself. 

 

Now, exiting The McKittrick Hotel’s parallel universe, let’s hit the streets.

Walking NYC

The French Impressionist painter Claude Monet said of his painting style and the artistic movement he subscribed to that “Impressionism is only direct sensation”.  The Impressionists rejected (and were rejected by) the established venues of art exhibition and so went outside the usual arenas to show their work.  They sought the “momentary, sensory effect of a scene - the impression” (Wolf, 2018).  You can see where this is headed.  I couldn’t help but see these walks through New York from within this impressionistic lens.  Threading the series of moments that make up these walks within a trail that purposely lacks a coherent narrative highlights the quality of constantly relocating oneself in a present time and space.  After all, on these walks, you’re not hearing about it, but rather you are actually there.  I don’t want to strain the whole Impressionist thing too far.  It might be a misguided errand of the mind to begin with, but for now, I’ll stick with it...
 

“These walks engage with the present space, the past, and the ever-potential future”

The three walks had in common direct engagement from within the space, “to heighten the senses so that you can experience or be part of the environment.”   All the senses were communicated with, but each walk favoured speaking to one in their mother tongue.  The Angel Project was all about looking and the visual. The participant was invited to take part in a viewing of their environment that was intermittently broad and deep, sweeping and penetrating, guarded and protective.  Her Long Black Hair was aural.  The disconcerting hybrid of recorded and present sound input was aimed at bringing the spectator closer into a place of engagement with the present time and place.   The Ground Zero Memorial Soundwalk painted with the medium that’s hardest to pin down: through memory and a sense of the nostalgic…”in order to build new emotive contours based on layers of memory—lived memory, imagined memory, postmemory.”  This walk traded in the currency of memory: walking the trail of the past through memory and seeing the present moments fold into the same path as it too becomes memory.


Prompt

Using Schechner’s somewhat pedantic sounding (yet flexible enough) criteria, 6 Axioms For Environmental Theatre as a point of departure, I’d like you to re-imagine a play or some part of a play that is normally subject to a conventional staging and how it could be brought to life in an “environmentally immersive key.”  Feel free to focus on one or more of Schechner's Axioms (no need to engage with all six elements), deviate from them or expand upon them.  Dealer’s choice.  Go for a ride with it, and take us with you.

No comments:

Post a Comment